Court reviews whether a buyer wrongfully refused to close on an agreement to purchase property

DAVID R. SEATON, ET AL. v. WISE PROPERTIES-TN, LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. June 22, 2012)

This appeal concerns a contract for the purchase and sale of property. The buyer refused to close pursuant to the terms of the contract and stopped payment on its earnest money check. The sellers brought an action for specific performance and breach of contract. The buyer alleged that the sellers breached the contract first. The trial court found in favor of the buyer, holding that because the sellers did not cause title to be examined ten days from the effective date of the contract, the buyer had a right to withdraw the earnest money payment. The sellers appeal. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Opinion available at:
https://www.tba.org/sites/default/files/seatond_062212.pdf

Court reviews a case involving a request for specific performance for a Grant of Right of Way

SEVIER COUNTY BANK v. EILEEN M. DIMECO, ET AL. (Tenn. Ct. App. June 26, 2012)

Sevier County Bank (“the Bank”) sued Eileen M. DiMeco, CitiMortgage, Inc., and First American Title Company seeking specific performance with regard to a Grant of Right of Way and Agreement to Dedicate (“the Agreement”) concerning a right of way to be used as a public road. The Bank filed a motion for summary judgment and after a hearing the Trial Court granted the Bank summary judgment. Ms. DiMeco appeals to this Court. We find and hold that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the Bank is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law, and we affirm. We further find this appeal frivolous and award the Bank attorney’s fees on appeal.

Opinion available at:
https://www.tba.org/sites/default/files/seviercountybank_062612.pdf

Court reviews the enforceability of a real estate sales contract

CASEY E. BEVANS v. RHONDA BURGESS ET AL. (Tenn. Ct. App. March 20, 2012)

Prospective buyer who signed real estate sales contract sued seller, seller’s real estate agent and broker, and the actual buyers for breach of contract, violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, and specific performance. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants on the ground that there was no enforceable contract. We affirm.

Opinion available at:
https://www.tba.org/sites/default/files/bevansc_032012.pdf